Trademark Attorney Serving Clients Nationwide

Intent to Use

A legal blog for small businesses and entrepreneurs

Intellectual Property | Trademarks

Boston & Chicago Sox Petition to Cancel Trademark

Jul 16, 2015

Taso Garbis 5 min read

Rarely do you see two opposing teams in Major League Baseball working together, but the Boston Red Sox and the Chicago White Sox have teamed up to petition for the cancellation of a trademark filed with the United States Patent and Trademark Office.

Both teams believe that they will be damaged by the continued registration of the mark BARRE SOX in International Class 25 for “sports and fitness apparel, namely, hats, t-shirts, and Jerseys.”  The BARRE SOX mark was registered on April 9, 2013, which shows that even with a trademark registration, there is still a chance you will have to deal with others with similar marks down the road.

According to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board Manual of Procedure (TBMP), a cancellation proceeding is a proceeding in which the plaintiff seeks to cancel an existing registration of a trademark.  The proceeding may only be filed after the issuance of the registration.  A petition for cancellation may be filed by “any person who believes that he is or will be damaged by the registration of the mark.”

In this case, the Boston and Chicago organizations both point to their longstanding use of their respective marks for identical goods/services and each offer a long list of registered trademarks they each maintain.  The extensive sales and promotion of goods and services associated with each mark has enabled both organizations to build “highly valuable goodwill in SOX marks, and said goodwill has become closely and uniquely identified and associated with Petitioners.”

Boston & Chicago argue that the word “Barre” is a geographic designation, just as Boston and Chicago are for their respective marks.  By making this argument, they put more weight on the importance of the SOX mark.  As a result, it is claimed that it is likely “to cause confusion, to cause mistake, and to deceive the trade and public, who are likely to believe that Registrant’s goods have their origin with Petitioners and/or that such goods are approved, endorsed or sponsored by Petitioners.”

It’ll be interesting to see how this one plays out.

You can read the whole pleading here.

Taso Garbis
Taso Garbis
Trademark Attorney

Helping businesses protect their brands with flat-fee federal trademark registration. No hourly billing, no surprises.

Book a Call

Understanding your Trademark Renewal

In this post, we are delving into a topic that holds crucial importance for anyone who has invested time, money, and effort into building a brand: trademark renewals. If you've ever wondered whether your hard-earned trademark can stand the test of time, the short...

Work With Me

How Can I Help Your Brand?

New Brand Launch
Clearance search + federal trademark application from start to finish.
Office Action Response
Got a USPTO rejection? I'll handle the response and fight for your mark.
Trademark Maintenance
Keep your registration alive with timely renewals and filings.
Get Started

The Complete Trademark Registration Package

No unpredictable hourly billing or hidden legal fees. Get start-to-finish federal protection for one straightforward flat fee.

Comprehensive Clearance Search
Custom Application Drafting
USPTO Filing & Strategy

Ready to protect your brand?

Flat fee federal trademark registration. No hourly billing, no hidden costs. Straightforward protection for your business.

Home - Short Contact Lead